Declined to Teach in New Zealand
WARNING! This is an admonition to all those non-New Zealand teachers looking to teach in New Zealand. Unless you’ve had some kind of prior New Zealand teacher training, you might as well not apply (at your own expense) for teacher registration in New Zealand. The teacher application process in New Zealand is a lengthy, costly ordeal that will leave you high and dry without a teacher registration, which you need in order to teach (legally) anywhere in North or South Islands in New Zealand.
For Alicia and me, it was more than a job, but a dream that was squashed by New Zealand’s Teachers Council when they decided not to issue Alicia or me a teaching registration. It took NZQA (New Zealand Qualifications Authority) http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/for-international/qual-eval/index.html and New Zealand Teachers Council http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/ collectively six months to decide that we (Alicia and I) were not fit to teach in their country. Imagine that! Two certified, highly experienced U.S. teachers, rejected ostensibly because our teacher training in the U.S. wasn’t “comparable” to teacher training in New Zealand. It seemed that the educational bureaucracies in New Zealand didn’t even take into account our combined 15 years of teaching experience, both in the U.S. and abroad (Venezuela, Costa Rica and Mexico). Instead they focused on our teacher training, done many years ago, and deemed us unfit to teach New Zealand children. Truly shocking and quite possibly discriminatory. It smacks of ethnocentrism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocentrism .
This is a cautionary tale that must be told, especially to all those foreign teachers that think they have a chance at teaching in New Zealand. They might be lured to the land down under by recruitment agencies or ads on the internet that speak of a teacher shortage. You’re officially forewarned!
Whether you’re fresh from college with a newly-minted teaching degree or teachers with many years of experience, like Alicia and I, all foreign teachers must apply to the government of New Zealand to be able to teach in that country. At the beginning, you will believe, like we did, that despite the mountain of paperwork that needs to be filled out and the lengthy process of review by not one, but two government bureaucracies (NZQA and NZ Teachers Council), your herculean/sisyphusian effort will have a payoff. When the payoff never comes (i.e. you receive your final “declined to teach” letter from New Zealand Teachers Council), you will have a variety of mixed emotions, including consternation, depression, denial (This really can’t be happening to me!), and anger. I don’t know what the official rejection statistics are, but I suspect a majority of unsuspecting foreign teachers, like us, are steadfastly denied teacher registration simply because our educational experience isn’t “comparable” to what New Zealand teachers experience.
Bottom line is that without an official teacher registration from New Zealand authorities, you, as a foreign teacher in excellent standing somewhere else in the world, will not be allowed to teach in any New Zealand school. There is no written caveat before you begin the application process that states you must be New Zealand trained, but once you’re into the thick of the paperwork, including having to send original documents to authorities in New Zealand, and paid your fees (hundreds of dollars), NZQA is the first to bring this to your attention once they’ve pronounced their prolonged assessment; this is after the fact. It’s systemic. You might find out sooner, if you are able to have a meeting with a principal at a potential school in New Zealand, like I did. The question most often asked is: “Do you have any New Zealand teacher training?” When your answer is, “No, I’m a foreign teacher,” you are stared at as if you are a two-headed monster.
Both Alicia and I would like to see statistics on how many foreign teachers are denied teacher registrations by Teachers Council in New Zealand each year. (But where are they to be found?) They have the final word on what your status will be. NZQA, the first agency that will review your extensive paperwork, will decide what track to put you on. After months of deliberation, I was put on track 2 and Alicia was put on track 4. We were both disappointed with these assessments as it meant we had a less likely chance of being awarded teacher registrations from Teachers Council. Track 1 is where you, as a foreign teacher, want to be. We weren’t. When I emailed my concern to the woman reviewing our applications for NZQA, she simply wrote back to us: “It doesn’t mean that you’ll be rejected.” But it did mean that there were red flags over our files.
Alicia and I started our applications for New Zealand teaching back in November of 2008 when we were still teaching in Mexico. NZQA didn’t make their assessment until February! Alicia got her letter on February 2, 2009, and it stated, in part:
Dear Alicia Frank Haviland
Thank you for you application for evaluation of your qualifications. Unfortunately the Qualifications Recognition Service (QRS) is unable to assess the pathway you completed in order to gain your Career and Technical Education Certificate. As a result your application fee will be refunded. Initial teacher training in New Zealand can only be completed as part of or following a completed academic qualification. This qualification must be registered at Level 7 on the New Zealand Register of Quality Assured Qualifications (the Register). More information about the New Zealand Register of Quality Assured Qualifications can be found at: http://ww.kiwiquals.govt.nz/about/index.html .There is no recognized teacher training pathway that can be completed without an academic qualification. As you do not hold a completed academic qualification* NZQA is not able to carry out a qualifications assessment. A teacher license is not an academic qualification and cannot be assessed independently of a completed qualification.
*For the record, Alicia completed a two-year teaching program for high school and college career and tech ed at Central Washington University.
Alicia and I were already in Auckland, NZ when we received this letter. It was heartbreaking to say the least. But, at least, we hoped, I would make it through NZQA’s “qualifications assessment.” Another few weeks passed by. The waiting was excruciating, but I filled the time sending our resumes and cover letters to elementary schools throughout Auckland and Wellington, NZ. As mentioned, I even scored a few in-person informational meetings with school principals. Then I received in March the NZQA letter, dated February 26, 2009. It left me bewildered and pissed off.
In part, it read: NZQA application number: 205908-1
Dear Joseph Anthony Haviland
Thank you for you request for an evaluation of your qualifications. The New Zealand Qualifications Authority’s (NZQA) report is enclosed…
Unfortunately your degree of Master of Science in Education cannot be given comparability to a recognized initial teaching qualification in New Zealand. The requirements of New Zealand primary teaching qualifications are very specific, including appropriate academic content and supervised teaching practice.
Information received from the University of Bridgeport showed that although you completed an internship in a school, you did not complete the kind of supervised teaching practice that would be expected of a New Zealand trained teacher. The information showed that the internship was more similar to working as a teacher aide, and that most students go on to complete student teaching practice as a separate course after completing the internship.**
As you do not hold an academic qualification recognized in New Zealand as an approved teacher education qualification you are not eligible for registration with the New Zealand Teachers Council under the regular pathway (Track 1).
The New Zealand Teachers Council does, however, have the discretionary provision to consider an applicant’s qualifications, work experience, and detailed supporting documentation as a package.
The New Zealand Teachers Council will be able to provide you with information regarding applying for teacher registration under their discretionary “Track 2” provisions
**Someone at University of Bridgeport gave NZQA the wrong information, but they accepted it as truth. My teaching internship over the course of one year was similar to working as a substitute teacher and there was also supervised teaching practice and mentoring as well. It surpassed student teaching practice, which was optional and essentially redundant at the end of my masters studies.
After receiving the letter, I felt as if I was dead in the water, so to speak. When I communicated this via email to my evaluator of Qualifications Recognition Services at NZQA, she wrote back that I was overreacting. That my being put on Track 2 was not the end.
At this point, both Alicia and I wanted to be done with New Zealand’s educational bureaucracy. I even contacted New Zealand Teachers Council, the next hurdle I had to make it over, and asked them to pull my application. They told me that wasn’t possible. It had to run its course.
Make a long story short, they finally made a decision a full two months (that’s approximately 60 days) later and in a letter dated April 27, 2009. By this time Alicia and I were back in the United States, living in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The letter said:
Dear Joseph
Your application for registration was considered by the New Zealand Teachers Council at its meeting this month.***
The council has declined your application on the grounds that it was not satisfied you are satisfactorily trained to teach as the combination of your qualifications, experience and appraisal did not form a package of equivalence to the Diploma of Teaching.
A teacher is satisfactorily trained to teach if: He or she has documented evidence of an initial (pre-service) teacher education qualification approved by the New Zealand Teachers Council; Or He or she has documented evidence of an initial (pre-service) teacher education qualification assesses by NZQA as being equivalent to a New Zealand diploma of Teaching qualification. Or If the evidence provided and considered as a package is sufficient to satisfy the Council that he or she is “satisfactorily trained to teach.”
At this time you do not meet the Council’s criteria to be registered as a teacher.
***Teachers Council meetings are held once a month. Because NZQA was slow in processing my assessment, I missed the March Teachers Council meeting and had to wait until their once-a-month meeting in April. As far as I know Teachers Council never scheduled emergency meetings. If you missed one meeting, your paperwork was forced to wait a whole extra month for review. How antiquated is this system?
At the end of the letter there was a statement about my placing an appeal (section 126 of the Education Act of 1989) if I was dissatisfied with the decision. If I was dissatisfied with the decision? Who wouldn’t be? Maybe I should have appealed, but the way Alicia and I have been treated by the people behind the bureaucracies in New Zealand, didn’t provide me with much hope for an appeal.
Throughout our ordeal with New Zealand, I felt that there was little support from the agencies we were dealing with. If you think bureaucracies are bad in the U.S., try New Zealand! As far as we were concerned the agency people we were dealing with could have all been robots! They have perfected use of a form letter and bureaucratic speak to a tee. Not once did I feel that they were on our side. If this was Vegas, I’d think the cards were stacked against us.
I’m a writer of letters to people in high places and when things went south for both Alicia and I in New Zealand in terms of securing teacher registrations, I thought about writing to some big wigs in NZQA and Teachers Council, but when we went to their respective websites, there were no names of agency officials posted, just the job titles. How bizarre!
In the end, both Alicia and I felt like the abandoned TV sitting on a street corner in Auckland. For weeks, while we were living in lovely sundrenched Freemans Bay, I’d run by it. Its face was plastered with yellow sticky tape that read repeatedly:

As far as we know, the derelict TV might still be sitting waiting for Auckland City Council to “investigate.”
It’s a fit metaphor for Alicia and my experience trying to get teacher registrations in New Zealand. We hope that other foreign teachers think before applying for teacher registrations in New Zealand. They need to stop and ask themselves if it’s worth it. In the end you too might be treated like the deserted TV, waiting for Council to investigate and then be cleaned up with the rest of the trash.
One final note: At an elementary school I visited just outside Wellington, NZ, I asked for a copy of the school’s Vision and Values statement. I believe NZQA and Teachers Council could learn something from it!
The school’s vision is “developing global citizens who are effective thinkers and learners.”
The school stated “Values we wish our students to demonstrate are…
Accepting responsibility
Courage
Helping and caring for others
Individual determination
Excellence
Valuing diversity
Encouraging respect
If proof of the aforementioned vision and values was a test for NZQA and Teachers Council, they’d have failed, especially in the area of valuing diversity and developing global citizens, who value the input that foreign teachers, not trained in New Zealand have to offer.
By insisting that foreign teachers be New Zealand trained suggests a closed educational system that prevents the exchange of fresh ideas and devalues diversity in its teaching staff. Perhaps a few key courageous people in the government of New Zealand need to re-evaluate the way foreign teachers applying for teacher registrations are treated by their paper-pushing, non-thinking evaluators. Someone’s got to accept responsibility for a system that’s missing effective thinkers and encouraging respect. Maybe the key (John Phillip Key) is the current prime minister of New Zealand. Perhaps he can start an investigation into the illegal dumping of foreign teachers with one declined for teaching letter after another? The New Zealand Herald certainly hasn’t after we were contacted by a reporter after we’d returned stateside. That same female reporter is now strangely silent. Our story (and the stories of hundreds of other foreign teachers who apply each year to teach in New Zealand and are rejected) isn’t newsworthy enough. What a shame and a sham!
Not once did Alicia and I feel helped and cared for by the agencies that were making a decision on our future livelihood in New Zealand. We’d hoped to teach in a dynamic foreign land down under and returned to the United States feeling disrespected and devalued.
In the end, New Zealand missed a golden opportunity to promote excellence along with cultural diversity by hiring highly capable teachers like Alicia and me. Shame on them for that! And shame on a government that allows that practice to continue.
(Footnote: If you are one of those foreign teachers who have applied to NZ and been rejected, or even accepted, please write us. We want to know what your experience was like.)
See our new Website! We have created www.southwestales.com, we are living in New Mexico now and are sharing new experiences with our readers of the South West and more! Check it out!
Written by Joseph A. Haviland
Edited by Alicia Frank Haviland
Copyright 2009




















































































